Comparing the Two Strategies
| Criterion | GitHub Flow | Git Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | Low | High |
| Release cadence | Continuous (CD) | Scheduled releases |
| Best for | Startups, small teams | App stores, enterprise |
GitHub Flow
Bash
git switch -c feat/user-auth
git add .
git commit -m "feat: JWT User "
git push -u origin feat/user-auth
# → PR → → main →
git branch -d feat/user-authGit Flow Primary Branches
| Branch | Role |
|---|---|
main | Production code, versioned with tags |
develop | Integration for the next release |
feat/* | Feature development |
release/* | QA and bug fixes |
hotfix/* | Emergency fixes |
Bash
git flow init
git flow feature start login
git flow feature finish login
git flow release start 1.2.0
git flow release finish 1.2.0Conventional Commits
CODE
feat(auth): JWT
fix(api): reply
docs: README
refactor(db):
chore:Branch Protection Rules (GitHub)
Settings → Branches → Add rule:
- Require pull request reviews (at least 1 reviewer)
- Require status checks (CI must pass)
- Restrict pushes (no direct pushes)
Editorial note
AI tools may assist drafting. Check the evidence in each guide for whether commands were run and which environment was used. Confirm the current docs for your version before applying instructions, and email us about errors. email us
Topic-related official docs (auto-linked · not per-claim sources)Git documentation ↗
Questions & answers
Ask a question about this guide. We'll review and reply.