2024 LLM releases: GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Llama 3
Historical scope: This article was first published on 31 May 2026 and looks back at models announced in 2024. Claude 3.5 Sonnet was announced in June 2024. This is neither a comparison written in 2024 nor a current model recommendation. Unsupported rankings and hypothetical industry success stories from the previous version have been removed. No API or performance tests were run for this revision.
For a current selection process, see the LLM model selection guide. Check model IDs, features, prices and retirement dates in each provider's current documentation before making a decision.
What the 2024 announcements establish
| Model | Announcement | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | OpenAI introduced it on 13 May 2024 for text, audio and vision | Current API availability or accuracy on your task |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Anthropic introduced the first Claude 3.5 model in June 2024 | Current version or performance on your documents |
| Llama 3 | Meta announced the family on 18 April 2024 | Your hosting cost, throughput or deployment conditions |
These are vendor announcements, not results of an independent test under shared conditions. They cannot justify a ranking for accuracy, cost or regulatory suitability. Self-hosting also incurs hardware, operations and security costs; it does not by itself establish compliance.
A repeatable selection method
- Define the task and unacceptable errors, such as missed clauses, unsupported citations or disclosure of personal information.
- Fix candidate model versions and record when you checked their current documentation, data terms and prices.
- Use the same authorized representative inputs, prompts, output format and retry rules for every candidate.
- Record accuracy, format compliance, latency, input and output tokens, and failure cases separately.
- Estimate API cost as monthly calls × ((mean input tokens × input price per million) + (mean output tokens × output price per million)) / 1,000,000. Account for storage, retrieval and operations separately.
- Keep model IDs in configuration. Re-evaluate before switching and define a rollback threshold for errors or latency.
Primary sources and limits
This is a review of announcements and an evaluation method. It does not verify industry fitness, certification, benchmark performance or cost advantage.
- Checked on
- Scope
- Primary announcement dates and comparison method; no model test or industry validation
- What changed
- Reframed as a retrospective; removed unsupported rankings and example outcomes
Sources and checks vary by article. Only articles with a recorded check date, scope and sources below were checked, and only within that scope. For other articles, verify against the current docs for your version before applying anything, and email us about errors. Editorial policy · email us
Comments
Be the first to comment.